A token launch shouldn't just answer “Where can people buy?” It should also answer “Why should they stay?” That's the conversation behind Episode 01 of Rebate Pad's comparison series, featuring Pangea. Both operate on the same chain and use Uniswap v4, but their approaches to token incentives are different. Rebate Pad is building around three key mechanics: → Bonus tokens on eligible buys. → Holder payouts for eligible participants. → 100% of launch liquidity burned. The philosophy is straightforward: put holders at the centre of the model and give participation more meaning than simply buying and selling. But as always, the real test is execution. Incentives need sustainable activity behind them to make a lasting difference. I'm curious to see which project gets the next episode. Who's next? Drop your pick below. 👇 @RebateLaunch robinhood:0xb7ff57631b97000d950236ef63bd463da5beba7e
We saved these words the moment we read them. They can't be changed here.
$REBATEStamped with the block it was said at, and the coin's price right then. It can't be moved later. at block101,745,061market cap then$627.8Know+65.5%best1.75×1h−6.8%24h+17.9%- price read from Uniswap v4 pool 0xdfc96a1b…d83c at block 101745061
- 1 of 5 pools read disagreed with the rest by more than 25% and were not used
- USDG counted as one dollar